Don Attacks FG Approach to the Fight against COVID
PROFPeter Jazzy-Ezeh
A Nigerian university don has attacked the current method in the fight against COVID-19 suggesting that there is the need for inter-disciplinary research collaboration in order to fully understand the new disease. Professor Peter Jazzy-Ezeh, an anthropologist at the University of Nigeria, Nsukka, (UNN) said that the social and ecological factors associated with the disease have not been fully captured in the global efforts to contain the medical problem.
Ezeh, former Head of UNN Department of Sociology and Anthropology, criticised the current approach to tackling the disease in his speech at an international conference of anthropologists at the University of Namibia (UNAM), Windhoek, Namibia, on Wednesday. The event originally planned as a physical meeting was changed to a virtual format due to the challenges posed by the disease. It was organised in collaboration of five major anthropological groups worldwide: World Council of Anthropological Associations (WCAA), Pan-African Anthropological Association (PAAA), Anthropology in Southern Africa (ASnA), Ethnological and Anthropological Society of Nigeria (EASON), and the host university, UNAM. Professor Ezeh is the President of EASON.
The Nigerian scholar said that some official reactions to the new disease were driven by panic and other non-medical factors even when the nature of the virus and how it spread were not yet fully understood.
He said it was against familiar medical logic that the disease was barely understood when the medical authorities rushed in a vaccine. Replying to a question later, he said that while medical scientists researched on discovering a vaccine in the more familiar ways, efforts at this point should have concentrated on non-vaccine preventive measures, and treatment of those that had already contracted the disease.
He also said that claims of cure and prophylactics from practitioners of ethnomedicine in such countries as Madagascar and Nigeria had not been given adequate attention, and wondered why there seemed to be desperation to promote vaccines by European and American pharmaceutical establishments.
Ezeh said, “There are claims that ethnomedicine is effective in fighting the disease. Have such claims been thoroughly investigated, and if indeed they are found to be credible, must the world continue to stick to the Hobson choice of vaccines of the Western-style medical model?”
According to the don, there are also reactions to the disease that suggest extra-medical influences that require investigations by specialists in other academic fileds. For example, he queried the haste with which travel ban was clamped on some African countries when the Omicron variant of the microbe was reported whereas nothing was done to the Chinese when the original form of the virus was found there.
He said, “When the generic microbe was discovered in China no travel ban was imposed on the Chinese. Contrariwise, when a variant of the microbe was found in South Africa, travel ban was imposed on the entire southern African region, and as the days go by, the ban is also being imposed on other countries on the continent.”
Suggesting that such reactions were not objective, the professor said, “Anthropological interventions can help sort out mere panic from genuine concerns and remove what some commentators see as inter-group bias from the strategies in tackling it (the virus)”.
According to him the way the virus spreads and the nature of the microbe ought to be independently investigated deeply and in multi-disciplinary ways than has so far been done. He suggested that it seemed that it spread faster in certain environments than in others. According to him, if such an observation is correct, it may be helpful if the factors that slow down the spread in those areas can be harnessed to help those in the areas where the spread is rapid.
Defending his observation in this regard, he asserted, “Anthropological knowledge has also the potential to help resolve some aetiological and therapeutic issues that are currently being debated on this disease. For example, with poorer medical facilities yet many West African countries at present seem to have lower morbidity rates from the disease than developed countries with better orthodox health care. Is the reason for this apparent epidemiological variability to be found in the ecology or environment of these localities, their sociality, or what?”
About Post Author
