Difference Between ICTN and IDR, CRI, RAR, PAAR
CONTAINER TERMINAL
By Eugene Nweke
Introduction
Recent social media discussions following the Maran Roundtable have centered on misleading claims by anti-ICTN implementation groups. These claims suggest that ICTN implementation is already covered by Customs and serves the same purpose as Import Duty Report (IDR), Clean Report of Inspection (CRI), Risk Assessment Report (RAR), and Pre-Arrival Assessment Report (PAAR). The Sea Empowerment and Research Center (SERC) aims to provide clarity on these misconceptions.
*The Difference Between Customs System Integrated Cargo Tracking and International Cargo Tracking Note (ICTN)*
*A. Customs System Integrated Cargo Tracking*
This system serves the following purposes:
1. *Compliance with WCO Safe Framework of Standards*: Ensures cargo tracking aligns with World Customs Organization’s (WCO) standards.
2. *Risk Management*: Identifies and tracks high-risk shipments.
3. *Real-time Tracking*: Monitors cargo movements in real-time.
4. *Secure Data Exchange*: Enables secure data sharing between customs authorities, shipping lines, and stakeholders.
*B. International Cargo Tracking Note (ICTN)*
ICTN is a national policy initiative that:
1. *Enhances National Import and Export Security*: Tracks cargo movements from origin to destination.
2. *Provides Unique Identifiers*: Assigns unique identifiers for tracking purposes.
3. *Complies with International Standards*: Aligns with WCO Safe Framework of Standards.
*C. Key Differences*
The main differences between Customs System Integrated Cargo Tracking and ICTN lie in their:
1. *Scope*: Customs system integrated cargo tracking encompasses various customs procedures, while ICTN focuses on cargo tracking and security.
2. *Purpose*: Customs system integrated cargo tracking facilitates customs procedures and risk management, whereas ICTN aims to enhance national import and export security.
3. *Implementation*: Customs system integrated cargo tracking is typically implemented by customs authorities, while ICTN involves multiple stakeholders.
*Addressing False Claims*
The claims that ICTN replicates the functions of IDR, CRI, RAR, and PAAR are misleading. These reports have limitations, including:
1. *Lack of Real-Time Tracking*
2. *Limited Scope*
3. *Dependence on Manual Processes*
4. *Vulnerability to Fraud*
In contrast, ICTN provides real-time tracking, comprehensive information, standardized and secure documentation, improved revenue collection, and enhanced cargo security.
*Addressing Claims of Additional Financial Burden*
The notion that ICTN imposes additional financial burdens on shippers is unfounded. ICTN is a national policy initiative for international trade and security. The benefits of ICTN implementation, including improved security, efficiency, and transparency, outweigh potential costs.
*Conclusion*
The Sea Empowerment and Research Center urges the public to disregard misleading claims about ICTN. Instead, we should focus on supporting the government’s efforts to secure our trade and port environment, enhance compliance with trade laws, and promote national prosperity.
For: SEA EMPOWERMENT AND RESEARCH CENTER – SEREC
Fwdr Eugene Nweke
Rff. H. O. R.
Introduction
Recent social media discussions following the Maran Roundtable have centered on misleading claims by anti-ICTN implementation groups. These claims suggest that ICTN implementation is already covered by Customs and serves the same purpose as Import Duty Report (IDR), Clean Report of Inspection (CRI), Risk Assessment Report (RAR), and Pre-Arrival Assessment Report (PAAR). The Sea Empowerment and Research Center (SERC) aims to provide clarity on these misconceptions.
*The Difference Between Customs System Integrated Cargo Tracking and International Cargo Tracking Note (ICTN)*
*A. Customs System Integrated Cargo Tracking*
This system serves the following purposes:
1. *Compliance with WCO Safe Framework of Standards*: Ensures cargo tracking aligns with World Customs Organization’s (WCO) standards.
2. *Risk Management*: Identifies and tracks high-risk shipments.
3. *Real-time Tracking*: Monitors cargo movements in real-time.
4. *Secure Data Exchange*: Enables secure data sharing between customs authorities, shipping lines, and stakeholders.
*B. International Cargo Tracking Note (ICTN)*
ICTN is a national policy initiative that:
1. *Enhances National Import and Export Security*: Tracks cargo movements from origin to destination.
2. *Provides Unique Identifiers*: Assigns unique identifiers for tracking purposes.
3. *Complies with International Standards*: Aligns with WCO Safe Framework of Standards.
*C. Key Differences*
The main differences between Customs System Integrated Cargo Tracking and ICTN lie in their:
1. *Scope*: Customs system integrated cargo tracking encompasses various customs procedures, while ICTN focuses on cargo tracking and security.
2. *Purpose*: Customs system integrated cargo tracking facilitates customs procedures and risk management, whereas ICTN aims to enhance national import and export security.
3. *Implementation*: Customs system integrated cargo tracking is typically implemented by customs authorities, while ICTN involves multiple stakeholders.
*Addressing False Claims*
The claims that ICTN replicates the functions of IDR, CRI, RAR, and PAAR are misleading. These reports have limitations, including:
1. *Lack of Real-Time Tracking*
2. *Limited Scope*
3. *Dependence on Manual Processes*
4. *Vulnerability to Fraud*
In contrast, ICTN provides real-time tracking, comprehensive information, standardized and secure documentation, improved revenue collection, and enhanced cargo security.
*Addressing Claims of Additional Financial Burden*
The notion that ICTN imposes additional financial burdens on shippers is unfounded. ICTN is a national policy initiative for international trade and security. The benefits of ICTN implementation, including improved security, efficiency, and transparency, outweigh potential costs.
*Conclusion*
The Sea Empowerment and Research Center urges the public to disregard misleading claims about ICTN. Instead, we should focus on supporting the government’s efforts to secure our trade and port environment, enhance compliance with trade laws, and promote national prosperity.
For: SEA EMPOWERMENT AND RESEARCH CENTER – SEREC
Fwdr Eugene Nweke
Rff. H. O. R.
FOLLOW US
About Post Author
